The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Keilana 01:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hwang Jin[edit]

Hwang Jin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unreferenced for more than eighteen months. Apparently original research. Mikeblas (talk) 18:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Duplicated work from within Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598). --Pmedema (talk) 20:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm inclined towards Keep. A few minutes searching found a couple of refs which I have added to the article. Seems to be a notable figure in Korean history.--Michig (talk) 21:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Michig; notability for 16th century Korea would have been on a par with David Petraeus. Pity the Koreans didn;t have the interwebs to write us reliable sources. Skomorokh ^incite 17:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Sources, significance, so Keep. Cool Hand Luke 20:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.