The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW; made up by problematic editor. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hunthagon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism. There are no references included in the article and a WP:BEFORE search did not provide reliable sources to prove the subject notable. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 06:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 06:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence that this has encyclopedic, as opposed to dictionary, usefulness. For that matter, it is not even evident that it is a standard word enough to put in a dictionary, but that is not the issue we face because Wikipedia is not a dictionary.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is something that an immature editor made up and inserted into the encyclopedia. It does not exist as a notable mathematical concept, as opposed to the similar Chiliagon, discussed by Descartes and other notable philosophers and mathematicians. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:39, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing found in Google scholar. Close to an A11 speedy, but it doesn't directly say that its author made up the term. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable neologism. Appears to come from here in 2009. Note that apparently the article has no idea how a Schläfli symbol works? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if not good-faith WP:MADEUP, it still seems like a WP:HOAX. What is the derivation of the prefix "huntha"? It's not listed at Numeral prefix, either in the Greek section (where we find penta-, octo-, dodeca- etc.) or elsewhere. A polygon with 100,000 sides would be a decakismyriagon, surely? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.