The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -Djsasso (talk) 22:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huaraz Satyricon[edit]

Huaraz Satyricon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No evidence of RS coverage, and there's nothing encyclopedic about this 'cafe'. Wikitravel already covers it in their article on the town. Travellingcari (talk) 05:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Looking at the Google hits, I can't see anything that would make this establishment notable. Bláthnaid 13:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Resolute 19:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.