The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus from contributing editors is that WP:GEOFEAT is met and despite 2 subsequent relists, no other editor offered a view contrary to keeping the article. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:13, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

House of Mihajlo Apostolski[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not seem to meet WP:GNG. Cultural Heritage of North Macedonia [mk] would be a good redirect/merge target, but unfortunately it does not exist in English Wikipedia. MarioGom (talk) 09:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and North Macedonia. MarioGom (talk) 09:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MarioGom, the Macedonian and the Bulgarian versions of this article exist with no problem. And this article was created as part of our WikiVillage Project by the Shared Knowledge user group. The article is QR-coded and inserted on a informational plaque. So, when ever someone scans the QR-code of this English article, the QR-code will lead nowhere because you nominated the article for deletion, and the point of the project would lose its meaning. Dandarmkd (talk) 10:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dandarmkd: English Wikipedia has a general notability guideline (GNG) that might be different from other projects. Existence in other languages is sometimes a signal of notability, but do not necessarily prove notability according to English Wikipedia policy. Note that the title does not need to be removed. It can be converted to a redirect, if an appropriate redirect article exists (such as Cultural Heritage of North Macedonia. MarioGom (talk) 11:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't see how having a QR has any relevance to this AFD to be honest. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GEOFEAT, as this is a nationally recognized cultural heritage site, and is presumed notable according to GEOFEAT. Pikavoom ^Talk 06:30, 11 July 2022 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet) --MarioGom (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GEOFEAT. Listed heritage building. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:18, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is the verifiable information beyond simple statistics (WP:GEOFEAT) available about this subject? MarioGom (talk) 08:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not great, I grant you. But a page exists on their website. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Whose only text is an extract of the first line of the Wikipedia page, and referenced to Wikipedia. WP:CITOGENESIS should be discounted here. This source provides even less verifiability than simple statistics. I don't think merely proving existence is enough to pass notability with WP:GEOFEAT? MarioGom (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 21:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GEOFEAT. Listed heritage building. Djflem (talk) 12:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Any verifiable information beyond simple statistics (WP:GEOFEAT)? Thanks. MarioGom (talk) 20:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Language is no doubt an issue, but open question of whether it passes GEOFEAT
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep a registered heritage building will have an explanation in relevant laws. We'd need to pull the laws, which will have references supporting the designation. I do not speak Macedonian so am unable to help in this regard however. Oaktree b (talk) 17:07, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Mentioned in this paper [1] and these five hits in GScholar[2], none of which I can read. Most might be hits on the General himself. Oaktree b (talk) 17:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep under WP:GEOFEAT given sources found by Oaktree b (I don't speak Macedonian either though). -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:18, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.