The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 19:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HotBasic[edit]

Prodded with "Non-notable. Failed VfD before; 107 unique google hits; official site has no Alexa rank." B/C of VfD (which contained a keep), sending it here. For that matter, prior VfD wasn't ever closed. I say speedy delete as closure of the old VfD, or failing that simply delete. Mangojuice^talk 12:48, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no indications of notability per WP:SOFTWARE. Sandstein 13:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• speedy delete NN Dominick ^(TALK) 14:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, but no speedy deletion. It tries to assert notability; the problem is that sufficient notability doesn't exist. -- Kicking222 15:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete but not speedy. 520 Ghits only.--Jusjih 18:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – insufficient notability, consensus to delete effectively already reached – Gurch 13:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.