The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

===Honduo===Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreadnaut

Honduo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A re-creation of an article that was speedily deleted under CSD G11 - blatant spam[1]. Nothing appears to have changed. Nominating for deletion and salting to prevent re-creation. Malcolmxl5 06:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 16:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Very spammy. Doctorfluffy 17:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't know about the spam or ad angle being noted about this artcile. However, it definitely needs secondary, verifiable references before it can be considered to to stay. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 19:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt per WP:NOT a promotional site. Chris! _ct 00:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.