The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HomeMatic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PRODUCT and parent company EQ3 has no article. I was unable to find sources other than press releases. Maybe someone who speaks German can help find German-language significant sources. shoy (reactions) 14:37, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Form fhelmli: I think it should stay because of:

compareable Produkts arge also at Wikipedia: I think that homematic is compareable to KNX KNX (standard). Knx hast got a very large Wiki Page.
I have Referenden ELV (mother Company of EQ3) in the Wiki article (as requested)
I have ade a reference to the official Homematic Webpage (as requested) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fhelmli (talk • contribs) 19:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that other products have articles has no bearing on this particular article. Wikipedia requires multiple reliable independent sources for each article, so coverage by newspapers or tech news websites, for example. shoy (reactions) 19:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:44, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some news article references. Is this what you request?comment added by Fhelmli —Preceding undated comment added 05:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and draft & userfy for now for the author as I'm not seeing much convincingly good. SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 17:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Current sources aren't enough to establish notability, and searches aren't turning up enough additional references to show notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.