The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdraw defaulting to keep. Valoem talk contrib 23:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HomeExchange.com[edit]

HomeExchange.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite its inclusion in the French Wikipedia , the company does not meet our WP:NCORP standards: The references are a mix of press releases, disguised press releases, and mere notices; not one of them provides substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources,. There are additional references in the French WP; I've checked them, and none of them are any better than the ones here. DGG ( talk ) 05:03, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I accept ref. 1 as high-quality significant independent coverage; ref .2 is a travel guide I would normally be skeptical about, Ref.3 seems a routine listing. Ref 4 probably is OK, though not visible; Ref 5. is PR ; Ref. 6 is a mention; Ref.7 , by the same author as ref 2, is in more detail, ( presumably a syndicated feature--I doubt that particular newspaper was the only place it was published) that reads in large part like a PR interview, Ref. 8 is a routine listing . So what we have is one good academic book, 1 probably good academic article, 2 articles fro ma well-know travel guide writer, andsome miscellaneous.
1 & 4 seem sufficient for an article, and I am withdrawing the AfD, with my customary thanks to Cunard. DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing the sources and withdrawing the AfD, DGG (talk · contribs)! Cunard (talk) 08:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.