The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, only indep. source is IMDB, which only lists 28 films, and doesn't indicate that any criteria of WP:PORNBIO are met. If someone wants to find sources and recreate, go ahead. NawlinWiki 04:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holly Halston[edit]

No evidence of notability per WP:PORNBIO Tabercil 17:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 17:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Prolific in the milf genre. Clearly passes WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 17:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm so embarassed making these comments on several of these types of actresses hence the new user name. I am embarassed to admit that I have watched some of these videos. The MILF is a genre but I haven't heard of this actress because of my ignorance and lack of interest in the genre. Blushing 19:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment MILF? She's just a kid. :) MarkBul 17:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Who are these people that think Wikipedia needs to be a repository for every $.25 porn actor? Anyway, Delete this as completely nn. Eusebeus 18:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Wknight94 (talk) 01:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Without sources, notability cannot be established. Mere assertions of notability are not enough--multiple reliable third party sources substantiating notability are required. Nick Graves 16:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NN (and doesn't turn me on).--LAZY 1L 05:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC) sockpuppet GRBerry 03:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do people want to delete every article that they don't like? There are others out there that love this girl. Go do something else useful instead of constantly nominating articles for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.215.52 (talk) 03:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If she were notable, there ought to be reliable sources to show her meeting at least one of the criteria #1-4 in WP:PORNBIO. EdJohnston 04:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.