The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-18 03:40Z

Hoboware[edit]

Neoglism I can find no evidence of being used. Prod was removed by an anonymous IP without explanation. J Milburn 21:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable neologism. semper fictilis 22:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

there seems to be one source provided, and I've seen it used before. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.97.237.101 (talk) 23:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

see http://1001010.com/blog/archives/000015.shtml

Comment: That is a blog, so unreliable, and the other source is very questionable. J Milburn 10:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how a page from the CS club from a reputable, first-world university can be questionable with respect to computer terminology. Dbelange 01:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like one professor's cute nickname for something. The only Google hits I see are for a software company called HOBOware, with no relation to the term. - BierHerr 02:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Semperf -- Monty845 03:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.