The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per Criterion 1 - no argument advanced for deletion. (non-admin closure) St Anselm (talk) 10:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History of Christian thought on abortion

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article duplicates material from Christianity and abortion and should be merged. Federales (talk) 04:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Well sourced summary style article on a defined aspect of a notable topic. Merging all this into the proposed article would cause WP:SIZE issues. Jclemens (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep: No argument for deletion proposed. Nom has only proposed the non-delete action of merging, so WP:SK per A1. Please see WP:MERGE regarding how to propose a merger. --Mike Agricola (talk) 20:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close -- An AFD nomination is not the correct procedure for merging. A merge ends with the article being redirected to the target (not deleted). Peterkingiron (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.