- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. WP:SK3/snow. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Histioea excreta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:N and WP:SPECIES Hongsy (talk) 05:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organisms, and Peru. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Not sure why the nom says it doesn't meet WP:NSPECIES. It appears to be a validly named species, so it would actually meet that expectation. Unless there's been some name changes, disputes, etc. I missed, I don't see the article going anywhere. KoA (talk) 12:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Perfectly fine taxon, valid name; LepIndex is reliable, and other DBs agree [1]. Why would this not meet WP:NSPECIES? What's up with all these weird taxon nominations these last few days? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable. Meets WP:NSPECIES
- --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 17:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.