The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I see a consensus to now Keep this article given the improvements made. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hip Hop Congress[edit]

Hip Hop Congress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find anything of any substance in news sources/independent sources about this organization. I added 'notability' and 'primary sources' tags 9 years ago and they were removed without addressing the problems. My attention was drawn back to it today when an IP editor added a press release. Time for the article to go, in my opinion, fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 23:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Organizations, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep. The article is kind of bad but the organization is notable. There’s a book here, an article here, as well as some in-depth coverage in a book about college students’ lives here. The subject (if not the article) passes GNG. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Added a few citations to the article Mrfoogles (talk) 03:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep given the suitable WP:THREE that were provided and now added by Mrfoogles. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 20:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV based on the cited references already in the article. The was a poorly thought through nomination. Additionally, there are other sources in google books, so it's clear WP:BEFORE was either not done or incompetently done.4meter4 (talk) 17:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.