This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:44, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

A good article might be written on relationships and/or similarities between Hinduism and Judaism, or failing that, an article might be written about claims that Judaism developed from Hinduism, if such claims have any following or currency among Hindu chauvinists, or New Age pseudohistorians, or whoever. This article, however, reads like an argumentative essay, lacks scholarly rigor, and cites no sources, not even for its quotations. This leads me to believe that it is just someone's pet theory, or original research, which we don't do here. —Charles P. ^(Mirv) 08:44, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Idiosyncratic, or at least minority, views presented as fact. Josh Cherry 15:50, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research. Bacchiad 17:58, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Philip 18:30, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original research (fuzzy at that). Wyss 21:43, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:47, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, POV original research. Megan1967 02:55, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Hey, this is great stuff! delete. --Zero 13:19, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:32, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.