The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 23:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hilaristurbing[edit]

Hilaristurbing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No reliable sources. Non-notable neologism. Google returns 18 hits including this article, a few blogs, and a few forums. Prod removed by anon. Onorem♠Dil 18:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Hilariously Delete Yngvarr (t) (c) 18:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Disturbingly Delete WP:NEO Keeper | 76 18:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete It's a story, not even an article about the word. -- Kl4m ^{T C} 19:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Endophrastically delete per nom. shoy 19:52, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per WP:N, WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP. Carlosguitar 22:09, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Pull the other one. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 22:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEO RainbowOfLight ^Talk 11:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.