The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Saint Kitts and Nevis–United Kingdom relations. j⚛e deckertalk 02:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

High Commission of Saint Kitts and Nevis, London[edit]

High Commission of Saint Kitts and Nevis, London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. embassies are not inherently notable. there is also no bilateral article to redirect to either. LibStar (talk) 01:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 16:27, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts Star, X? Stlwart111 12:01, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I would support such a redirect.- MrX 13:08, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.