The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:IAR application of U5 in articlespace, as this was clearly intended as a social-networking page. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hewagamage[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks weird, I'm not sure if it is ok. 333 -blue 10:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Looks like a Facebook group in the wrong place. Were this a user page I'd tag it for WP:U5 for speedy deletion. Certainly violates WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 14:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. I have always said that there needs to be a speedy deletion category for pages that are not intended to be encyclopedic articles. This may fall under WP:G6's "unambiguously created in error" catchall, but I think this is a prime example of why we need a speedy deletion category for purely non-encyclopedic content. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTHERE also apply. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.