The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hero (Warcraft)[edit]

While this was recently proposed for a merge, the content of this article still has various issues such as poor sourcing, lack of notability, and rich of gamecruft while reading like a game guide, giving little to nothing to merge to its target.

This article's references are all derived from a single source, Battle.net. With that, there are no third-party sources to establish its notability to the real world and non-players of the Warcraft series.

It also has a large amount of game-related cruft which may have the tendency to attract original research, furthering itself from getting a proper source.

Finally, Wikipedia is not a guide, and this article appears to be nearly entirely nothing more than a game guide. IAmSasori (talk) 22:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Keeper | 76 23:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't notable, and we're not a game guide, so the article should be deleted. It could also then be redirected. I (talk) 04:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 11:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Just like Creep, the article is part definition and part non-notable fan information. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All cruft. Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 22:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.