The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 15:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help Wanted / Reef Blower / Tea at the Treedome[edit]

The article is basically a re-write of the script and could not be improved without significant re-writing. It contains no information as to the voice cast or creative people involved in the ep, nor does it cover the creative processes or ideas that went into it. thewinchester 13:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- This article is not a stub, it's not "poorly written" but it isn't the best written. it could do with some trimming, expansion and excising and it would be a decent episode article. There is a consensus episode articles are encyclopaedic (Wikipedia is also not paper remember), the article does not appear to be "indiscriminate information" and looks perfectly notable enough, I also advise tagging for ((cleanup)) and secondary sources. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 16:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's not a stub, but it is pretty poorly written. I'm also not sure how much of it would remain if unencyclopaedic plot outline were removed. GassyGuy 01:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- The article at the moment contains way too much plot outline and far too little commentary, particularly seeing as it was the first episode of a popular series: there ought to be a lot of commentary out there that could be cited. But a lot of the outline needs to be cut out; there's way too much of it, and it may not qualify as fair use. JulesH 18:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there's already articles for each episode Help Wanted (SpongeBob SquarePants), Reef Blower and Tea at the Treedome. --Caldorwards4 19:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant 10:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Caldorwards4, individual episode pages are much more encyclopedic, maintainable, plus they have the advantage of already fitting within naming conventions. Invite the author to add any information that might have been missed into the other three articles. -- RoninBK _{T C} 11:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as we already have articles on each of the three segments. There are several other articles like this one; I have prodded them. AgentPeppermint 23:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - what a waste of space. Deb 12:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.