The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Core desat 02:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HelixWind[edit]

Less than year-old company. Most Ghits (like the "references" in the article--start of second ref: "HelixWind is a startup founded by my friend Ken Morgan.") are blogs and other 'anyone can post' sites, and/or brief regurgitations those blogs, etc., or from the company's press releases and/or website. Doesn't seem to have enough broad, reliable coverage to meet WP:CORP. Ravenna1961 04:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Companies has been notified of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 20:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I was eyeing this a couple days ago. With no improvements to bring it up to par, I'd have to say delete. - Rjd0060 05:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article, but get rid of the link to crispyneurons. Coverage on EcoGeek (which made it on Digg) and Cleantech isn't trivial. - Gecko 18:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 22:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand Article has potential but needs to have notability expanded a bit.--English836 (talk) 00:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sources--and even the article--make it clear that there are only prototypes at this point. They are not yet notable for producing anything. WP is NOT advertising to promote new products, especially if the documentation is only blog postings!DGG (talk) 21:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for not meeting WP:CORP. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.