The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Article is sourced, and if the notability were questionable, he wouldn't have been in that encyclopedia in the first place. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich Freudweiler[edit]

Heinrich Freudweiler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced biography. Questionable notability. Article creator refused to provide additional sources for verification. Kumioko (talk) 14:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep He's in Grove Art Online (Ingrid Sattel Bernardini. "Freudweiler, Heinrich." Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. Web. 28 Jan. 2013.) which indicates he's likely to be notable. That article offers the following bibliography:

Zürcher Kunstgesellschaft: Katalog der Sammlung von Gemälden und Bildwerken im Kunsthaus (Zurich, 3/1910), pp. 34–5

W. Hugelshofer: Schweizer Kleinmeister (Zurich, 1943), p. 16

E. Gradmann and A. M. Cetto: Schweizer Malerei und Zeichnung im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert (Basle, 1944), pp. 31, 72–3

P. Wescher: Die Romantik in der schweizer Malerei (Frauenfeld, 1947), pp. 92–3

Von Gessner bis Turner: Zeichnungen und Aquarelle von 1750–1850 im Kunsthaus Zürich Graphische Sammlung (exh. cat. by B. von Waldkirch, Zurich, Ksthaus, 1988), pp. 17–19

--Colapeninsula (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep, nominator doesn't understand what "unsourced" means, and hasn't made any effort to find sources obviously, even though this is required before posting an AfD. There are books about this painter,[1] and [2]. Fram (talk) 15:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per Fram. Article is plainly not unsourced, and the subject's entry in a "standard reference work" is prima facie evidence of notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.