The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heidi Montag Records[edit]

Heidi Montag Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No significant coverage in third party sources (or any coverage at all, really). This article fails WP:CORP. --Pokerdance (talk/contribs) 19:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --this google search shows that the Wikipeida article is the only article to actually discuss the company. Every other hit is about Montang recording music. So pretty much this is the only site that's talking about the record company, (well there is a myspace about the company but that is not a reliable source.) So. Delete. (I also tried an image search to maybe find a logo and still no results) KMFDM FAN ^(talk!) 20:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per KMFDM Fan. Iowateen (talk) 02:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:16, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:16, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:CORP.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Klat" 09:28, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.