The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Uriah Heep (band). —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-11 00:29Z

Heepster[edit]

Okay, I like Uriah Heep as much as the next person, but can see two problems with this article. It's nothing more than a dicdef and a link farm. Given the topic it will never be anything more than a dicdef. Suggest either deleting or merging with Uriah Heep (band). Dragomiloff 01:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Uriah Heep (band), then change to redirect. I can find apparently long-standing references to the 'term', (e.g. "Hi, here is Rodrigo Werneck, a Heepster from Brazil."). But that it is still just a definition, which could (should?) be inside the Uriah Heep (band) article. Shenme 03:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect - Simple one sentence concept and that's all there is to it, no need for an article. - Arch NME 18:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above ffm ^yes? 21:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The article, at this point in time, is too small. I reccomend that it be merged with other articles. Jtg920 23:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Uriah Heep (band) per above. Also merge the references to the "External links" section--they may aid in the development of the Uriah Heep article and can always be removed if found to be irrelevant. -- Black Falcon 17:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.