The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snowball close, Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heat Source Unit Nuclear Reactor[edit]

Heat Source Unit Nuclear Reactor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unsourced, unverifiable statement of design goals, attempting to solicit discussion of an idea rather than contribute to an encyclopedia Philip Trueman (talk) 11:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete: Non-encyclopedic - would require a major rewrite. Doesn't seem notable either. Just some advert for available jobs asking for discussion of this 'revolutionary' idea...... Densock .. Talk^{(Dendodge on a public network)} 11:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete Agree with above, also note in Talk:Heat Source Unit Nuclear Reactor the primary author says "At this stage, this is more of a mental exercise". This implies that this is the author's own research, thus WP:NOR applies. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 11:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.