The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Healthcare Today[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been at enWP for ten+ years, and has not progressed and still does not have independent references that demonstrate any notability. Makes unsupported claims, and reads as still being as light advertising as initially created. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:GNG. The website itself appears to be out of date: the Headlines page has "news" from 2014 and the Latest News page appears to be just an aggregator of newspapers' health section stories. I suspect it's an ad sheet for health-related businesses, so fails WP:CORP. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:18, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 18:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 18:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 18:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Their website contains lots of out of date news leading me to believe it isn't maintained properly and they are NN. Szzuk (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.