The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 00:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haxie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has had notability tag since 2010. Does not seem sufficiently notable. Contains only 2 refs, arguably very low quality ref sources. David Condrey ^{log talk} 06:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 13:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister talk 06:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Essentially agree with Nwlaw63, thank you for doing the due diligence on this one. And also agree with SwisterTwister, that is, without prejudice toward recreation with a well-sourced article, at some point in time in the future. — Cirt (talk) 17:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.