The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Phil Neville#Personal life. ♠PMC(talk) 22:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harvey Neville[edit]

Harvey Neville (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited, so he's not simply notable because of his notable father. He's also not notable as a footballer, as he's never played in a competitive, senior match for a fully professional club. He's ALSO not notable for any other reason, as demonstrated by the lack of non-routine coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Fails both WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. – PeeJay 15:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – PeeJay 16:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 16:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
so player signings and international call ups are now routine? SK2242 (talk) 00:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Have they ever not been? JoelleJay (talk) 01:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think you’re stretching this; the articles provide SIGCOV of Harvey and that’s that really. This doesn’t fall under WP:NCORP where the standards are clearly higher to keep out nn spam. SK2242 (talk) 00:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.