The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (no place given to merge to). Cbrown1023 talk 03:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Tipper (TimeSplitters)[edit]

Delete or Merge The character is not notable enough for his own article. Plain and simple. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit me § Contributions} ♣ 05:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge per nom. Timesplitters is not the Simpsons; it doesn't deserve it's own article for each new character. Part Deux 08:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete This charecter is noteable enough, he is the base of an existing joke thoughout the series. Also he is not a new character, he is in all 3 of the TimeSplitters games.
- That doesn't mean anything. He still isn't noteworthy enough for his own article, mainly because of lack of info. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit me § Contributions} ♣ 01:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Mark D. 09:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If there is not enough verifiable information for a full article, then the correct action, per WP:FICT, is merger into List of characters in TimeSplitters series. Uncle G 14:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into List of characters in TimeSplitters series per Uncle G. No need to delete, and the redirect could be useful. delldot | talk 17:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. This would be appropriate content for a list or article on characters, but the list that had existed is gone.--Kubigula (talk) 19:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.