The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Bucketsofg 23:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harold cleworth[edit]

Harold cleworth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Does not assert the importance or significance of its subject, only sources seem to be the artist's personal art gallery web pages. Seinfreak37 14:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no sources, no references = no notability Alf photoman 15:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant 10:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete - may be notable, but all the references are to his own site; no evidence of coverage by independent sources as required by WP:BIO. Delete unless further external sources are added. Walton monarchist89 10:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Creator has had plenty of time to provide sources beyond the subject's personal webpage and nothing has been added. Fails WP:V. janejellyroll 11:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I added material about an exhibit at Petersen Automotive Museum --Eastmain 03:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep due to references added by Eastmain. Alf photoman 16:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.