The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hand in Hand (Grace song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced tracklist. Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 12:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is more than a tracklist. Meets WP:NSONG #1, charted in a national chart (#38 in the UK). Potentially meets WP:NSONG #3: Has been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups, although that would mean counting the two different artists who performed it, plus a emix, as 'several.' Boleyn (talk) 20:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As stated by @Boleyn: above, this was a UK top 40 entry. I can add a reference for its chart peak, but the article should really be titled 'Hand in Hand (Looking for Sweet Inspiration) ', as Opus III were the act who first recorded it, under that title, in 1994.Nqr9 (talk) 23:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep I added reviews form WP:RSes. Seems to pass WP:NSONG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 02:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.