The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Type design. Cirt (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hamburgefonts[edit]

Hamburgefonts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Permanent-stub, dictionary definition. I can't see any possible expansion beyond a dicdef. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 14:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator- no room for expansion, not even 'Hamburgefonts in Popular Culture'. -Kuzaar^-T-C- 14:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge & redirect to type design - The information in the article is valid and encyclopedic, and describes part of the process of designing a font or typeface. Thus, if there is not enough material to support a stand-alone article, it should be merged per WP:PRESERVE. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge/Redirect to type design or typesetting, otherwise it's just a dictionary entry on its own. -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 07:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.