The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure). Firstly, there is a reasonably clear emerging view that this is notable. Secondly, while there is indeed a housing program by this name, as far as I can construe from Swedish translators and the DE Wikipedia, this is more than just a housing estate: it's actually a borough of the tenth largest city in Sweden. WilliamH (talk) 20:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hageby[edit]

Hageby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete basically a housing estate, not notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - my sweedish isn't that good, but best I can tell this is just an apartment complex --T-rex 03:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This appears to be a real and distinct district [1] that even has it's own shopping center (called the "Hageby Centrum") and there seems to be plenty of reliable sources either about this area or references to it.[2]--Oakshade (talk) 05:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. As well as the Google News hits found by Oakshade there are plenty of book references also found by Google. I wish people would do simple searches like these before wasting eberyone's valuable editing time by nominating clearly notable articles for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.