The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haebangsan Hotel[edit]

Haebangsan Hotel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This hotel appears to be non-notable. The references I can turn up to it are all passing and do not sound very notable. Lonely Planet Korea has a single sentence [1] that reads, "Centrally located, this hotel has decent enough rooms, a good shop, pool tables and an office for booking international train tickets." The Rough Guide to Korea [2] describes it in a passing reference and concludes, "...24-hour running water is not guaranteed. Another drawback is a near-total lack of atmosphere or on-site activities." Neither of these suggest notability, and do not seem to pass WP:GNG. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 02:37, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 23:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 05:14, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.