The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 20:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Haberler.com[edit]

Haberler.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to have sufficient coverage, Non Notable website. Dtt1^Talk 10:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Dtt1^Talk 10:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete it fails WP:WEB and also lacks independent sources. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC) *Draftify after reading the opinions of LadyofShalott and Keivan.f, i am ok with draftification. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A mediocre Turkish news website just like Yeniçağ, BirGün and Vatan. It seems logical to not find any sources other than the website itself, which website is going to advertise its competitor? ~Styyx (talk) 10:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• KeepIt is a Turkish news site. and ranked by Alexa 1420, Hi can you give us your opinion and delete this discussion if you accept the article User:LadyofShalott this page also has a page in Turkish and French --Omar albayrak (talk) 11:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I’m not entirely sure why my opinion was sought here, but I neither have any expertise in this matter, nor do I read Turkish, in which language I would guess most possible sources would be listed. I am at this point at least going to remain neutral on the deletion, but I would suggest the article creator try to find additional references to show notability of the site. I did look at the French and Turkish articles to see if either could serve for expansion or providing additional references, but it does not appear that way (and each language wiki has its own notability requirements). One possible solution would be to move the article to draft space for further development. LadyofShalott 18:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral, but "leaning" towards a keep because the website is among the popularly viewed mediocre news websites in Turkey, so that would make it kinda notable. Keivan.f^Talk 08:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral. This website is marked with ((Notability)) in Turkish Wikipedia. I'm not sure if it's notable or not.--evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 09:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I take the point that it may be logically impossible to find RS references about a news portal, but I don't know if that's enough of a justification to get around the notability requirements? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify To give the creating editor a chance to at least try to find sources (I tried, and failed), I'd say let's draftify this, or at least not delete in haste. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The biggest problem is that Haberler.com means "News.com". When you search it you simply get Turkish news, even from other publishers. ~Styyx ^{Hi! ^-^} 15:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• The original editor is blocked as a sockpuppet. Who will be editing this article if it is to be moved to draftspace? @DoubleGrazing, LadyofShalott, and TheBirdsShedTears (not watching, please ((ping))) czar 20:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Fair point. :) I've changed my earlier draftify to delete. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment if the editor is blocked then there is no reason to draftify this article. Delete this. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since this doesn't seem notable enough to pass the guidelines. Maybe a case could be made that news websites will inherently fail the standard or whatever, but I don't think this AfD is the place to legitimate it. It's not like the article can't be recreated at some point if an exception is ever made anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete based on my mini research, it seems there is no source available to show its notability. The other news publications mentioned above, however, have at least one notable event. There is not much about this at the moment. This can be brought back in later as said by Adamant1. Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 15:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.