The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nom withdrawn. PhilKnight (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HMAT Berrima[edit]

HMAT Berrima (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Tagged for speedy deletion due to no context, no sources listed, only "source" listed in the article is a "Recommened reading". Dusti^{complain/compliment} 14:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Is this the same ship as HMAS Berrima? Redirect if so. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to HMAS Berrima. It's the same ship; it would've been renamed to HMAT Berrima when it became a troopship. --Sugarbutty 16:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per above. PhilKnight (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I am in favor of redirecting Dusti^{complain/compliment} 16:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.