The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to HEPA. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HEGA[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any sources. Septrillion (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This acronym is in use in the filtering field: [1], [2], and security field, e.g., [3]. I don't think it has the notability of HEPA, but it would be due weight to mention it in the HEPA article, if only to clarify the difference between the two types of filtration. --Mark viking (talk) 18:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a stub since 2005. Szzuk (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to HEPA, make a mention there. It is being used [4][5] but not exactly frequently, which suggest supporting the term but redirecting. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to HEPA, it is a stub for a long time, I think it Should be merged with its own section on the HEPA page. Felicia (talk) 01:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.