The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Pointy nomination, user has been reported for being disruptive. Speedy close.. (non-admin closure) Dusti^*poke* 23:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

H-58 (Michigan county highway)[edit]

Not notable county road. Recommend Deletion. Gamweb (talk) 19:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Nominator is trying to make a point by nominating for deletion. –Fredddie ™ 19:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not certain what your point is, but perhaps you should Assume Good Faith. Gamweb (talk) 23:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging an article for deletion that was written by someone who tagged an article you worked on is disruptive to the encyclopedia. –Fredddie ™ 23:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Article is well-referenced and notable. older ≠ wiser 20:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Article is notable due to it being the primary access for a US National Lakeshore, and with its upgrades from the state of Michigan, it is a primary connector between Munising and Grand Marais. –User:riehlj —Preceding undated comment added 20:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Strong oppose and suggest closure per WP:SNOW—The Alger County Road Commission recently completed paving this road. That paving was funded by the National Park Service, and literally took an Act of Congress to complete. (The NPS was required to build its own access road to the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore when the park was created in the 1960s. No such road was even built, and Congress amended the legislation creating the park to allow the NPS to fund reconstruction efforts by the ACRC.) This county road is it as part of the Michigan County-Designated Highway System, a system of primary county roads that acts as a secondary highway system in the state, albeit under county maintenance. CDHs carry the same designation across county lines, and those designations are assigned, not by the counties, but by the Michigan Department of Transportation. The nominator of this AfD discussion is likely making a WP:POINT because I have nominated several Florida county roads for deletion or merger. Unlike this road, they do not have any significance outside of their counties, and even that significance is debatable. Imzadi 1979 → 22:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not certain what your point is, but perhaps you should Assume Good Faith. Gamweb (talk) 23:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not certain what YOUR point is, but perhaps you should follow your comments, please. I am tempted to close this now as a snow close. I suggest you withdraw your nomination. Dusti^*poke* 23:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tagging 3 articles (CR 492, H-58, H-63) worked on or created by one editor (Imzadi1979) when asked to comment on 3 AfDs (CR 509, CR 511, CR 516) that were opened by that same editor (Imzadi1979) is disruptive. and WP:POINTy. Imzadi 1979 → 23:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep well sourced CTJF83 chat 23:22, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.