The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per unanimous consensus. ---- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gyorn[edit]

Gyorn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable fictional rank. Google returns under 100 hits with no reliable sources devoting substantial coverage to the rank itself, which fails notability guidelines in WP:FICT / WP:N. Additionally, what little content the article has is plot summary and it has not been expanded upon in over a year indicating there is no real-world significance or analysis available. Doctorfluffy (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not notable outside of the fictional universe it appears in. WP:FICT and all that. Lankiveil ^{(complaints | disco)} 14:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete and merge content into Elantris. A fictional rank from a single novel is Not Notable. CWC 06:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and merge as above. Eithin (talk) 13:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —86.149.53.196 (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.