The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Weizman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have found links at News and browsers but still nothing actually suggesting the convincing independent notability, the Dutch Wiki offers nothing else better. SwisterTwister talk 19:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have also found links at GNews, but they do suggest notability: a small biography in De Volkskrant (national newspaper); a larger bio in the same newspaper (paywall, but that's not a reason to dismiss a source) and a few more. According to these sources, Weizman will replace Ola Mafaalani as head of the Noord Nederlands Toneel in 2017, one of the four largest Dutch theatre ensembles, funded by the government. Being director of a such big organisation satisfies WP:NBIO, methinks. - HyperGaruda (talk) 12:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the website of Dagblad van het Noorden [1] gives 17 results when you search for "Guy Weizman". – Editør (talk) 15:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.