The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:44, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gulf Masika[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. No indication of notability for this magazine. All ghits I can find are press releases or promotional blurbs. bonadea contributions talk 16:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-or possibly merge into a list if there is one? Since I'm not sure about this thing at all. But for now delete. Wgolf (talk) 15:09, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, article posted by COI editor, who is also doing some disruptive editing Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've now semi-protected the page because of the repeated removal of the AfD notice, and warned him to cease doing this and blanking articles. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.