The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greyhawk Holidays[edit]

Greyhawk Holidays (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I hesitate to say gamecruft, but I suggest this is certainly trivia and fails WP:NOT. EliminatorJR ^Talk 01:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I say gamecruft G1ggy ^{Stalk - Talk - Chalk} 04:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Almost completely in-universe - the only handwave of context is the opening paragraph. This sort of content belongs back in the roleplaying sourcebooks where it came from. Zetawoof_(ζ) 08:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. This is like one long trivia article. This does fail WP:NOT. Felixboy
• Delete, a list of fictional holidays is not encyclopaedic. -- Mithent 23:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.