The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by RHaworth. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Green cedar valley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is neither a Wikipedia-style, over here what the user's page. The easiest way is to build everything from scratch, or to make corrections, here's my opinion. Lukaslt13 --Talk 20:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and I CSD'd. Absolutely no evidence of notability. Looks like junk. Legacypac (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete some kind of non-notable online learning platform. Doesn't seem like much independent coverage.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.