The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Green-storming[edit]

Green-storming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Advertisement for a non-notable book with 4 google hits. Damiens.rf 19:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 07:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The Nominator is correct: Notability of the book is not at all established. Moreover, the article reads more like an advertising. --Abrech (talk) 07:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It is a non-notable book. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete self-published non-notable book.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs)

• Delete This appears to be mere advertising to me. I don't see an encyclopedic level of notability. Deli nk (talk) 14:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, advert. Stifle (talk) 19:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.