The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 22:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greek Vulgate[edit]

Greek Vulgate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For more than 12 years, this article has been without a single source. I cannot find any mention of this expression "Greek Vulgate" on the internet outside of a wiki which very likely copied this Wikipedia page. Other sources given on the talk page of the article either contradict what the article says (libertyparkusafd.org, Ernest Cadman Colwell, E.C.Colwell) or are not precise enough (Migne).
Please keep in mind that "Vulgate" also simply means "commonly used" and can be used in various contexts; therefore, academics could have used the term "Vulgate" in relationship to Greek texts without making a reference to a standard, fixed referent. Veverve (talk) 08:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Veverve (talk) 08:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I must note that the page has been completely changed by @Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: after this nomination. Veverve (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:HEY Keep in that I think the pre-nomination version wasn't worth keeping, but the current, improved-post-AfD-nom version seems to be a worthwhile and sourced stub. Jclemens (talk) 19:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep following the improvements made and sources added.Mccapra (talk) 12:45, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The article has been extensively improved and reliable sources added to support the statements. --Ashleyyoursmile! 15:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Efforts made by Jonathan de Boyne Pollard is great, this article is worth keeping. It is a stub, but well-sourced and well-referenced. SunDawn (talk) 03:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.