The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy redirect. The article had been redirected for eleven months until an anon resurrected it today. Non-admin closure. – sgeureka ^t•c 17:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grawp[edit]

Grawp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines with third-party non-trivial coverage as set out at WP:FICT and WP:FANCRUFT. Wiwayb (talk) 11:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy redirect to Rubeus Hagrid#Grawp as this is how this has been from 30 July 2007 to today until an ip address restored an article. The character is already covered significantly enough in the Hagrid article. A quick revert back to the redirect is appropriate. Davewild (talk) 12:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to HAGGER????????????????????????. No, seriously, Redirect to Rubeus Hagrid#Grawp, the character isn't notable enough for their own page. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy redirect per above. Not notable enough for own article. LaraLove|Talk 16:50, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.