The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 22:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gorge (horse)[edit]

Gorge (horse) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable horse whose best finish wasn't even a show, and in an event with no page here. But he has "hopes" for the future. Glenfarclas (talk) 22:55, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the horse have archieved nothing of relevance, it seems to be just another good (but not notable) horse.Dentren | Talk 23:15, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable. The article can be recreated when (if?) the horse actually achieves something, rather than just having hopes for the future. Dana boomer (talk) 22:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, you're right, by "best finish" I was referring to what the article called his "most high-profile run," but obviously I picked my words badly. --Glenfarclas (talk) 07:34, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 15:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.