The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gonzo the Mechanical Bastard[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 17:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Extreme comic cruft that fails GNG.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:55, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Honestly, this is one of the worst examples of fancruft that I have ever seen. Gonzo is a non-notable comic book character who is barely notable from an in-universe perspective. I assume that this article has only survived because of its subject's obscurity. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 13:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sourced only to comic books, and my attempts to find mentions in reliable sources led to finding absolutely nothing to support having an article on this. Agree with User:Susmuffin, this article is possibly the worst fancruft article I've seen. Hog Farm (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.