The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Girma Hailu[edit]

Girma Hailu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails the WP:NSCHOLAR criteria, and as that is an exclusive guideline, I don't need to invoke the GNG. Also, those awards are in-school, they all come from Harvard, not an exterior grading org. L3X1 (distant write) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• • Nom Com Author and main contributor indeffed for sock puppetry. relevant SPI L3X1 (distant write) 16:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Citation record not enough for WP:PROF#C1 and while it's possible to be notable for excellent teaching (and it appears he really is an excellent teacher) it's very much doing it the hard way. The local awards listed are not enough; we need some broader recognition of his teaching excellence. And the coverage at [1] is too bare-bones to even make a step towards WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. A little too soon for WP:Prof#C1 but is likely to catch up in the future, plus excellence in teaching. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.