The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 20:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get Polson[edit]

Get Polson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Movie does not appear to have seen any offline distribution. While it did have an article written about it in a paper,[1] it seems unlikely this film will be remembered in a couple of years time: Many hundreds of films are rejected by Tropfest every year. -- Mark Chovain 02:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless notability is asserted with verifiable reliable sources (not just a link to YouTube). Billscottbob (talk) 02:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above Zarboki (talk) 03:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - there is of course no way that any of you could have known this, but the film was referenced by John Polson in a recent Triple J interview, and an audio segment will be posted shortly. There are also soon to be negotiations about having the film screened at Tropfest prior to the finalists' entries each year as a nod to all those who were not successful. The film is also being advertised in a major weekend paper on the 24th February (2008) which will boost the film's profile (has already achieved over 1,000 hits on Youtube).

Onlyadamantium (talk) 13:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.