The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If the memorial he modeled for can be found to be notable, a redirect can be recreated. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

George Browse[edit]

George Browse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Not a notable soldier, and the statue he was modelled on is not notable either. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 02:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 02:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 02:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 02:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. This sorely fails WP:SOLDIER and does not come close to meeting WP:BASIC. I could find no sources showing the subject's notability, thus it fails WP:GNG. Also, the third reference in the article is a mirror site from Wikipedia. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 20:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.